Continuous-Flow Streamwise Thermal Gradient
Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) Counter (CFSTGC): Mapping the Instrument Performance CURRENT RESEARCH Last Updated: January 12, 2006 The CFSTGC can generate supersaturations (SS) within the range of 0.06% - 3%, though we generally operate below 1% SS since this is the highest supersaturation expected for clouds. Unfortunately, water vapor supersaturation of such low magnitude cannot be measured directly very precisely. Any probe that enters the region of supersaturation will experience condensation, thereby affecting the measurement. Another potential mechanism for measuring the supersaturation is by absorption of infrared radiation, but this will heat the water vapor being measured and will lower the supersaturation. Instead, we use a fluid dynamics model to understand and predict the supersaturation that is generated within the CCN column of the CFSTGC. The temperature gradient, total volumetric flow rate and pressure are needed as inputs to the model. The higher the pressure, total volumetric flow rate and temperature gradient, the higher the supersaturation. ![]() One of the biggest uncertainties of the model is the actual temperature inside the column, which controls supersaturation. Unfortunately, this temperature is not directly measurable. Instead, we control the temperature of the outside of the column. Not taking into account the temperature drop through the column walls can lead to a significant overestimate of supersaturation. To get around this problem (and for validation of the model), we calibrate the instrument supersaturation by introducing aerosol of known particle size and chemical composition (e.g. pure NaCl) into the instrument. There is a well-known theory for the supersaturation needed to "activate" a NaCl seed particle of a given size [Kohler, 1936]. Once the particle's "critical supersaturation" is attained, the particle grows very quickly (by condensation) into a cloud droplet, and is subsequently detected by the downstream Optical Particle Counter (OPC). The following figure demonstrates how we determine the instrument supersaturation from the experimental "activation curve" (at the point where 50% of the particles activate). The particle critical supersaturation (the supersaturation required for a particle to activate) is inversely related to the size of the particle. ![]() The supersaturation that is inferred from the particle growth tells us what the actual temperature must have been inside the column. We then compare this temperature with the imposed temperature, according to the following definition for "thermal efficiency". ![]() Thermal efficiency changes with the instrument operating conditions. For example, a higher flow rate leads to greater cooling at the inner walls of the column by forced convection, which leads to a larger temperature drop through the column walls and a lower thermal efficiency. Instead of calibrating the instrument for every set of operating conditions, we instead infer the overall thermal resistance of the materials in the column wall. Thermal resistance is a property of the materials and their thicknesses, and does not change significantly with the instrument operating conditions. Once the thermal resistance is determined using a separate heat transfer model, the thermal efficiency can be predicted for any set of operating conditions using the fluid dynamics model. Once the true temperature within the column is known, the supersaturation can be accurately calculated. We also use a droplet growth model to determine the size of the droplets at the exit of the CCN column, and the efficiency of droplet detection by the Optical Particle Counter (OPC), for different operating conditions and different types of aerosol particles. The paper describing this research is: Lance, S., J. Medina, J.N. Smith and A. Nenes (APR 2006). "Mapping the operation of the DMT Continuous Flow CCN counter", Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40 (4): 242−254. Citations: 1) H. Kohler (1936). "The Nucleus in and the Growth of Hygroscopic Droplets." Trans. Faraday Soc. 1152−1161 |